What England Means to Me

A Domesday Book of the mind

Glyn Coventry

with 2 comments

I suppose, as an Englishman, I share a generic mindset with any patriot of any country anywhere in the world. I’m driven by a deep sense of love of my country, a binding with it, a sense of identity with its very fabric and a longing for its commonweal and prosperity. Simultaneously, I feel a need to protect it, to spare it from embarrassment and to rail against the machinations of those who wish it harm. I realise there is nothing specifically English in these sentiments: I’m sure many non-English relate to this mindset too. Clearly, “Englishness” is more about a uniqueness, a set of idiosyncracies which collectively mark us out as being…. us.

We live south of Scotland and East of Wales on the island of Great Britain. From the genesis of our nationhood when Saxon and Angle intermarried and settled in the land that became England we have marked out this England as our ancestral land. We were one of the first European countries to unify and form a distinct identity. We have had this identity for over a thousand years and despite William the Conqueror, the Act of Union and latterly, the onslaught of Multiculturalism, our individual nationhood has remained strong. Moreover, this sense of history, tradition, nationhood pervades my sense of Self. This is reinforced by the physicality of my environs. I am reminded of my English roots in our interesting ancient buildings, our beautiful countryside and our dramatic coastline. The architecture of our towns and cities is a unique menagerie of styles that reflect some aspect of our national journey.

For me there is a solidity, borne of the state, that is attached to being English. Our institutions are ingrained in our sub-consciousness. Whether or not one agrees with them, our monarchy, aristocracy, democracy, Parliament, civil service, armed forces and Church all work well and generally to a high standard! Centuries of refinement and testing out have resulted in evolved structures of state that can be taken as a “given”. I know they are there and that they work: I don’t have to worry about coups d’etat, dictatorship, a corrupt judiciary or biased civil service. Within this framework I am free to speak my mind, I am free to make decisions, I am free to live a lifestyle that enables me to express myself and be happy (but with the proviso that I don’t harm others and abide by our laws). Basically, I can get on with my life as an Englishman unlike, alas, many in Africa, South America and Asia.

I’m proud to be English! We have certainly made our mark on the world. Our language is universal. Our literature, music, science, engineering, architecture, TV shows etc. have all, (disproportionately for such a small nation) influenced the world scene. We spawned some of the world’s firsts…modern science through Newton, Darwin and others, the agricultural and industrial revolutions, manifold inventions and innovations, wonderful literature and poetry and fantastic music. The list isn’t exhaustive. We also spawned the largest empire the world has ever seen which, in my opinion, was a force for great good in the world and, importantly, have since become the world’s greatest de-coloniser. We established workable democracies and viable economies in these former colonies and have nurtured them in nationhood with aid thereafter. We won two World Wars. We have fraternally stood by our allies in time of their darkest hours, witness Belgium, Poland and latterly the USA after 9/11. We continue to stand up for what is right in the world, even if this means loss of our dear compatriots. We continue to contribute, innovate, invent and influence.

I think we English are a people of character. We have a great sense of humour. We like to talk to one another: even strangers will utilise the topic of the weather to break the ice. As a conversion develops humour tends to creep in at some point. I notice that English people are more likely to use smiles and other aspects of facial expression to convey a positive contact when they meet others (notice how cold many Europeans are in contrast). We tend to be very accepting and polite to others. Our cultural etiquette demands that we see our faces and that we convey an openness, an acceptance of the other and that we should attempt to be civil. I’ve noticed, having travelled abroad, the absence of this politeness and friendliness. We can be eccentric and quirky. We facilitate self-expression and tend to accept the unusual. We can be seen as libertarian but there are cultural rules of engagement to ensure a propensity toward mutual respect.

Being English for me involves a good sense of the above. It is about connecting to one’s roots, being proud of our nation’s historical journey (warts and all!) and expressing one’s self to others in our unique way.

Share This

February 7th, 2010 at 4:44 am

Posted in Essays

2 Responses to 'Glyn Coventry'

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. Good article which shows our majority positive side I feel that one thing is missing. The reality that our freedoms of speech and association are gradually being taken away from us. Another point is that our Constitutional Monarchy system of government has been a great help in retaining our freedoms. I travel abroad a lot and have seen the same freedoms in other countries with similar types of government, whereas presidential systems seem to greate corruption.
    John

    john dodds

    8 Feb 10 at 5:14 am

  2. John, thanks for your comments. I personally don’t sense that my freedom of speech and association is being taken away.Parliament, with our democracy remain supreme. The constitutional position of the monarchy hasn’t been called on in my lifetime to ensure this.

    I do feel though, that our media is highly manipulative of ‘the masses’ in very subtle and clever ways so that one could argue that freedom of thought is illusory. Our opinions are much more shaped by the media than most people would believe comfortable and certainly the expression of that opinion appears to be edited by the media to suit the politics of others. The world that is presented to us is very different from the world I know.

    With regard to the monarchy, I believe that the model of leadership of a nation is almost irrelevant so long as it works. Presidency seems to work well in many countries and the people usually have a chance to vote that person in! However, there is a lot to be said for monarchy in England. It is part of the ’solidity’ of state I previously referred to. It is about the personification of one’s nation, glory and history.I do believe though, that when our present queen dies, we should move to a republic. Any model of monarchy requires a mystique, a respect born of the office for its own sake. We now live in a world where respect is not given by right to any position in society. Witness the lack of respect (compared to say, 40 years ago)to teachers, vicars, the police,etc. Society has changed considerably in this time but I feel the model of monarchy that has evolved to this point does not fit comfortably with the’age of the common person’ and will almost certainly be out of place in 20 years time.In addition, the death of empire probably means we have too much imperial bling around for the size and power of our state.We have to be realistic.

    Glyn Coventry

    13 Feb 10 at 4:29 am

Leave a Reply